Improving school climate, not just security, is key to violence prevention

first_img TAGSSchool Shootingsthe Previous articleApopka Burglary ReportNext articleJoin The Apopka Voice team: Sales Associate needed Denise Connell RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR Maria Martinez Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter Agree wholeheartedly!! 1 COMMENT Florida gas prices jump 12 cents; most expensive since 2014 You have entered an incorrect email address! Please enter your email address here Gov. DeSantis says new moment-of-silence law in public schools protects religious freedom May 23, 2018 at 6:50 amcenter_img Please enter your comment! Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Reply By F. Chris Curran, Assistant Professor of Public Policy, University of Maryland, Baltimore County and first published by theconversation.comSchool shootings like the one that took place in Santa Fe, Texas, on May 18 are often followed by calls for enhanced security measures.But Santa Fe High School already had many of these security measures in place.For instance, the high school had a school resource officer who responded to the attack. The school also had security cameras in place and had recently conducted active shooting training and drills.As the nation searches for ways to prevent school violence, the focus must be as much on school climate and culture as it is on school security. I make this argument as an educational researcher who studies school safety.Calls for beefed up securityMany of the security measures in place at Santa Fe High School were called for in the wake of the Feb. 14 school shooting in Parkland, Florida. For instance, several states have passed legislation to increase law enforcement presence at schools. The federal government expanded funding to support the use of security measures such as metal detectors as well as training for threat identification and emergency response.Beyond the school walls, there have been broader calls for gun control. It is notable that the weapons used in the attack are reported to have been owned legally by the father of the shooter and were not the type targeted by most gun control proposals.One area that often gets overlooked in the aftermath of these tragedies is school culture. News reports indicate the shooter was reportedly bullied by other students and coaching staff. School officials, however, dispute this account.An examination of the school culture at Santa Fe High School could prove as important as a review of the school security measures that were in place and the extent to which they were followed.Why school climate mattersResearch has consistently shown that positive school climate is a strong predictor of school safety. When students have healthy peer relationships, teachers they trust, and school policies that they perceive as fair, they are more likely to feel safe in the school and less likely to misbehave.Building a sense of community among students and adults in schools may reduce the risk of school violence.Some advocates have called for a return to greater use of exclusionary discipline practices like suspension.Given the importance of supportive school climates for student safety, it is important to consider how the use of security measures and discipline practices that are meant to enhance safety might actually decrease it.Unintended consequences of securityThe use of visible security measures have been linked to lower measures of school safety. Likewise, the research on the use of law enforcement in schools is at best mixed.Prior work suggests that school resource officers can improve some measures of safety but can also result in more student arrests. They may also contribute to the use of more punitive school disciplinary environments.Research on school discipline suggests that suspending students from school can weaken students’ ties to the school community. When such exclusion is perceived as unfair, as might arise in the case of an overly prescriptive zero tolerance policy, the damage to school connectedness may be even more pronounced.The need for a balanced approachAs policymakers and school leaders respond to the most recent school tragedy in Santa Fe, they should be mindful of the full implications of their choices for enhancing safety. The use of security measures like law enforcement may deter or minimize the damage of a school shooting, but their use must be balanced with approaches that enhance community within schools.Luckily, there are promising approaches that schools can take to building trust and community among stakeholders.The presence of school counselors and partnerships with community organizations can help ensure that students have a trusted adult in the building and access to necessary mental health supports when needed. Restorative justice practices have shown promise as an alternative to suspension. Such practices focus on the rebuilding of trust among the student and school community instead of excluding the student from school. Other anti-bullying efforts may also be considered as part of such an approach.No student should have to fear for his or her life at school. Taking a multifaceted approach – one that balances security with community building – may help ensure that tragedies such as the one that unfolded in Santa Fe are fewer and further between. Please enter your name here UF/IFAS in Apopka will temporarily house District staff; saves almost $400,000 LEAVE A REPLY Cancel replylast_img read more

Relocation spend ensures smooth transition

first_imgRelated posts:No related photos. Comments are closed. Previous Article Next Article Employers spend an average £12,000 on temporary accommodation, estate agentsand legal fees every time they relocate a member of staff within the UK. A study by IRS Employment Review finds that more than a third of companies willbe increasingly likely to relocate staff over the next three years, compared toone in 10 which anticipate a reduction in staff relocation. Nearly half of the 48 companies surveyed expect to increase theirinternational relocation of staff, while just 12 per cent think this activitywill decrease. The cost of relocating staff internationally has risen from £12,500 threeyears ago to £15,000, while the cost of UK staff relocation has fallen from£15,000 to £12,000 per employee over the same period. The research shows staff are less likely to want to relocate than they werethree years ago, mainly because developments in IT and communications have madeteleworking a viable option. Mark Crail, managing editor of IRS Employment Review, believes spendingmoney on staff relocation to make the process as painless as possible is aworthwhile investment. He said: “It costs companies a great deal to relocate staff. Those whodo it well invest in making the move as easy as possible for their employeesand their families – particularly when the move takes them abroad. At a timewhen specialist skills are in short supply this is a good investment with realbenefits to both sides.” Relocation spend ensures smooth transitionOn 12 Mar 2002 in Personnel Todaylast_img read more